Well, they do not. Details from Faiz at Think Progress.More on the Kevin Drum submit referenced below about who won Florida in 2000 from Liberalism with out Cynicism in “Wasn’t even shut”.Left I On the News on Corporate media.Oh, look, a complete blog about newspaper corrections, Regret The Error (via The Blogometer).Ted Kennedy’s article in the Washington Post Saturday on “Alito’s Credibility Problem” enumerates a few of the superb examples of this proper-wing crackpot’s dishonesty.Another motive I’d like to see ReddHedd run for office: “The Imperial Presidency” at Firedoglake.The increasingly spectacular Glenn Greenwald asks the superb query, “What are Democrats so afraid of?” at Unclaimed Territory. I’m sick of people who niggle over an absent word (like “privacy”) with a view to justify refusing Americans their rights while concurrently ignoring whole swathes of clear Constitutional textual content (just like the Fourth Amendment) with the intention to do the identical. They don’t seem to be being “Constitutional students”, they’re just trying to destroy the Constitution. Period. I’m sick of hearing conservatives seek advice from the astute authorized mind of some hack who plainly needs to disregard the content material of the Constitution altogether. Hell, yes. (via)If I’m studying this right, Matthew Yglesias is advocating caving in without a battle on Alito because god forbid we must always waste power preventing him when we may elect progressive Democrats who the Republicans will get the Supreme Court to say did not win.

Well, trying to claim Alito just isn’t an ideologue who will overturn Roe, amongst different things. Without pretending to indorse these assertions, which it can be fallacious to do in the absence of adequate expertise, it is correct to name consideration to them, and to claim severe consideration for them; they proceed from physicians of excessive professional standing, who converse from their very own expertise, and so they agree, furthermore, with what maybe might have been feared or predicted on physiological grounds. He would give Bush efficient control of all three branches of authorities and the hard-proper lengthy-term dominance of the excessive court. For this reason, researchers believed it might be a possible treatment for prime blood pressure and angina, a type of chest pain associated with coronary heart disease. Very real nationwide safety threats floor, with the potential for elevated crime. By the time Redenbacher died at age 88, he was a nationwide celeb, because of the usage of his name and picture on his product’s label and in countless magazine ads and Tv commercials. Would you like to watch commentary on the news by specialists whose opinions do not come from the daily talking points of both political social gathering?

Taylor Marsh responds to Matt Yglesias’ unusual dismissal of preventing the Alito nomination.The Talking Dog has interviewed Jose Padilla’s lawyer, Andrew Patel, and Baher Azmy who’s representing Murat Kurnaz, a Guantanamo Bay detainee. And:Today’s Republican Senators just love talking about how they all voted for Ginsburg in 1993.But do you know how lots of immediately’s 55 Republican Senators truly voted for Ginsburg in 1993? I do not want anything to keep me awake: That is the show.These people haven’t any patriotism, no love of American freedoms, and no ethics. Romance is nice, but is true love the grand sweeping gestures of ardour we fantasize about? The few that have been – like Jesse Helms – voted No on Ginsburg.Brownback, Cornyn, Graham, Rick Santorum, Tom Coburn, Jim Inhofe, Jon Kyl, Jeff Sessions, John Thune – can you image these Dobsonites voting for Ginsburg or Breyer? That’s a much better lead-up than we had earlier than the John Roberts hearings. One female advantage is in verbal fluency the place they have been discovered to carry out better in vocabulary, studying comprehension, speech manufacturing and essay writing. Just 18. (And one in every of them, Richard Shelby, was a Democrat on the time.) One-third of the present crop.

If one chooses to be a 2 meter bitch succubus with giganormous breasts, tentacles, huge ram’s horns, a fanged vagina and wings as huge as a storage door clearly one inhabits another purposeful area of interest than a cute petite little neko succubus that wears a pink little slave collar and crawls around mewling, licking milk from a dish on all fours all day. His affirmation or rejection will depend on the gumption of the Senate Democratic leadership and independence of a few Republicans.A front-page story in as we speak’s WaPo says Alito really proved “his mettle” in Reagan’s Justice Department – the web page includes a video of Alito answering questions about how much of a right-wing crackpot he’s: Asked his opinion of President Ronald Reagan’s nomination of Robert H. Bork to the Supreme Court, Alito gave a ringing protection of the conservative icon he mentioned had been “unjustifiably rejected” by the Senate in probably the most ideologically polarizing nomination battles in many years.We still have our work reduce out for us on the notion of Alito on abortion – the WaPo studies that polls present most people opposing the form of guy Alito is with out really opposing Alito. Someone spank him, will you?